ArticleGlobal challenges (Hoboken, NJ)2026
Dual Saturation in Soil Carbon Sequestration: Biophysical Limits and the Operational Capacity of Farmers.
Article in Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global soils can store approximately 1500 Pg C in the upper meter and about 2344 Pg C within the upper 3 m, making soil organic carbon (SOC) the largest actively managed terrestrial carbon reservoir. Beyond its climate mitigation role, SOC underpins essential ecosystem services-including soil fertility, water regulation, and ecosystem stability-that support resilient agricultural landscapes and the long-term reliability of food production systems. However, discussions of soil carbon sequestration often focus on biophysical potential while overlooking the human and institutional systems that determine whether this potential can be realized. This Perspective therefore introduces the concept of "dual saturation", arguing that the global potential for soil carbon sequestration is constrained not only by biophysical limits of soil carbon stabilization but also by the operational capacity of farmers to implement complex ecological management practices. Biophysical saturation represents the desired restoration endpoint; operational saturation represents a systemic failure condition. The two are mutually exclusive in practice-and together constitute a self-defeating state, since operational saturation prevents soils from ever approaching their biophysical ceiling. Drawing on evidence from agri-environmental policy research and carbon-farming initiatives, the article argues that administrative complexity, regulatory instability, and documentation requirements can reduce participation in soil carbon-enhancing programs despite available incentives. Supporting farmers' operational capacity through stable and low-friction policy environments thus emerges as an essential enabling condition for large-scale soil carbon restoration and for safeguarding the planetary health functions of agricultural landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.