Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305171›Full record

ArticleJTCVS structural and endovascular2025

Helical classification of type B aortic dissections.

Johan Bondesson, Shanmugesh Raja, Ga-Young Suh, Brant W Ullery, Michael D Dake, Jason T Lee, Christopher P Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS structural and endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johan BondessonDivision of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Shanmugesh RajaDivision of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Ga-Young SuhDivision of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Brant W UlleryProvidence Heart and Vascular Institute, Portland, Ore.
Michael D DakeDepartment of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz.
Jason T LeeDivision of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Christopher P ChengDivision of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Although anecdotal findings of spiraling aortic dissections have been reported, the mechanisms of dissection propagation are unclear; hence, we categorized type B dissection helicity and mechanistically explain distinct propagation patterns. Methods: From computed tomography of 102 patients, type B dissections were geometrically modeled from entry tear to renovisceral aorta and helical properties were quantified. Results: There were 4 distinct helical groups: right-hand chiral, left-hand chiral, mixed-chiral, and nonhelical. Right- and left-hand chiral cases exhibit true lumen blood supply to the celiac artery (CA) from the left side, whereas mixed-chiral and nonhelical cases supply the CA from the right, with only a few exceptions of CA ostial avulsion. Conclusions: Although left-hand chiral dissections make a gentle twist to have the true lumen supplying the CA from the left side, the right-hand cases must twist in the opposite direction much more dramatically to supply the CA also from the left. The prevalence of mixed-chiral cases suggests that chirality in the proximal descending thoracic aorta tends to reverse spiraling direction to supply the CA via the true lumen. This mechanistic description of dissection propagation improves the understanding of aortic dissection anatomy and pathophysiology, paving the way for better diagnostics and treatments.

Indexed as

false lumenostial avulsionrenovisceral perfusionspiral morphologythoracic aortic dissectiontrue lumen

Identifiers

PMID42305171
PMCPMC13244737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.