ArticleJTCVS structural and endovascular2025
Fate of dilated ascending aorta after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Article in JTCVS structural and endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Poststenotic ascending aortic dilation has been extensively studied, with most studies focusing on surgical aortic valve replacement outcomes. Very few studies have evaluated outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study evaluated changes of poststenotic ascending aortic dilation after TAVR, as well as the incidence of aortic intervention. Methods: Patients with aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR over a 5-year study period were evaluated at a single institution. All patients with ascending aortas ≥4.0 cm were included. Continuous variables were analyzed using parametric or nonparametric tests, as appropriate, and a linear regression model was used to evaluate an estimate of the progression of aortic size over time. Results: In all, 115 of 1184 (9.7%) patients undergoing TAVR had a dilated ascending aorta, including 6.1% who had a bicuspid aortic valve, with 25.2% female. The average Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score was 8.1 ± 4.2%. Median follow-up was 2.49 years (interquartile range, 0.4-6.1 years). The average aortic size preoperatively was 4.3 ± 0.3 cm. Patients with bicuspid valves had a larger mean aortic size compared with those with a tricuspid valve (4.5 ± 0.5 cm vs 4.2 ± 0.3 cm, Conclusions: For patients with aortic stenosis and a moderate dilated ascending aorta, TAVR appears to be safe in those with a dilated ascending aorta at intermediate follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.