Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305166›Full record

ArticleJTCVS structural and endovascular2025

Predicting subclinical leaflet thrombosis in self-expandable prosthesis: A multimodal machine learning analysis.

Marco Moscarelli, Thanos Athanasiou, Roberto Casula, Vincenzo Pernice, Gregorio Zaccone, Adriana Zlahoda-Huzior, Dariusz Dudek, Sabrina Milo, Giuseppe Speziale, Antonio Fabbrizio and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS structural and endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marco MoscarelliDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Maria Eleonora Hospital, GVM Care&Research, Palermo, Italy.
Thanos AthanasiouDepartment of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Roberto CasulaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Vincenzo PerniceDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Maria Eleonora Hospital, GVM Care&Research, Palermo, Italy.
Gregorio ZacconeDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Maria Eleonora Hospital, GVM Care&Research, Palermo, Italy.
Adriana Zlahoda-HuziorSimhub, Virmed, Krakow, Poland.
Dariusz DudekCenter for Digital Medicine and Robotics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Sabrina MiloDepartment of Radiology, Maria Eleonora Hospital, GVM Care&Research, Palermo, Italy.
Giuseppe SpezialeDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Maria Eleonora Hospital, GVM Care&Research, Palermo, Italy.
Antonio FabbrizioDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, eCampus University, Novedrate, Italy.
Khalil FattouchKore University of Medicine, Enna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Subclinical leaflet thrombosis is a known finding after transcatheter aortic valve implantation, but its predictors remain poorly defined. Machine learning offers new opportunities for identifying complex, nonlinear relationships among clinical, anatomic, and hematological variables. Methods: We analyzed data from 118 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation with self-expanding valves and scheduled multidetector computed tomography at 6 months. A total of 120 preprocedural and postprocedural variables were included. Three machine learning models, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression, Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting, were trained and internally validated using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Results: Subclinical leaflet thrombosis was identified in 22 patients (18.6%). Bicuspid aortic valve morphology emerged as one of the strongest predictors across all machine learning models (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator β = 1.33; Gini = 1.31; SHapley Additive exPlanations = 0.42). Other top predictors included serum creatinine (β = 0.29; Gini = 0.90), hemoglobin decrease (β = 0.05; Gini = 1.32; SHapley Additive exPlanations = 0.10), hematocrit decrease (β = 0.02; Gini = 1.43; SHapley Additive exPlanations = 0.11), and platelet nadir (SHapley Additive exPlanations = 0.09). All models demonstrated strong discriminative ability (area under the curve range, 0.84-0.89; Brier scores: 0.040-0.163). Conclusions: This is the first study to apply a multimodal machine learning framework to predict subclinical leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Bicuspid anatomy and perioperative hematological changes were consistently associated with subclinical leaflet thrombosis, highlighting the potential of machine learning to enhance postprocedural risk stratification. Incorporating routinely available variables into machine learning models may help guide early imaging and personalized antithrombotic strategies.

Indexed as

machine learningsubclinical leaflet thrombosistranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID42305166
PMCPMC13244739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.