ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026
Existence of gender bias in clinical dentistry: A cross-sectional study on Perception and experience of dental clinicians at a private dental institute in Lahore.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Objective: Gender bias continues to shape the experiences of healthcare professionals, including those in dentistry. Although more women are joining the dental workforce, unequal opportunities, differences in patient perceptions, and subtle workplace discrimination still exist. This study explored dental clinicians' perceptions and experiences concerning gender-bias in clinical opportunities and patient preferences. Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 110 dental clinicians at CMH Lahore Medical College & Institute of Dentistry from April-August 2025. Data was collected using a validated questionnaire (Cronbach's α = 0.739) and analyzed through descriptive statistics and chi-square tests using SPSS version 26. Results: Out of 110 respondents, 70% were female and 30% male. Significantly more females than males (57.1% vs. 3%, p<0.001) felt that the opposite gender was more confident clinically, felt males were generally more favored in dentistry (75.3% vs. 24.2%, p<0.001), reported facing some form of gender-based discrimination in terms of clinical opportunities or recognition of their skills(61.0% vs. 12.1%, p<0.001), and experienced patients requesting to be treated by the opposite gender (68.8% vs. 42.4%, p=0.009). Conclusion: The study highlights that gender bias in dentistry remains a subtle but influential factor in shaping clinical experiences and confidence levels. Although many patients say that they have no gender preferences upfront but gender biases are still evident. Although patient education can help but cultural mindsets are not easy to change. However, encouraging mentorship, promoting gender-sensitive training, and ensuring fair institutional policies can help create a more balanced and supportive professional environment for all dental practitioners and reduce interpersonal bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.