Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305011›Full record

ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2026

Perfusion imaging abnormalities in acute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: A case series.

Derek Tsang, Andrew Cho, Karthik Lalwani, Vivek Yedavalli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Derek TsangDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3439-4461
Andrew ChoDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Karthik LalwaniDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Vivek YedavalliDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2450-4014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical value of perfusion imaging in arterial ischemic stroke is well established, but its interpretation in cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) remains less clearly defined. We present a case series of five patients with acute CVST who demonstrated perfusion abnormalities on initial CT perfusion (CTP) or MR perfusion (MRP). The observed findings demonstrated a spectrum of venous hemodynamic patterns. Several patients showed delayed transit metrics, including increased MTT or Tmax, with preserved or increased CBV, suggesting venous congestion or vasogenic edema rather than arterial-type ischemic penumbra. In contrast, one patient demonstrated delayed transit with decreased CBV and CBF, suggesting more advanced venous infarction or tissue-level perfusion failure. One additional patient demonstrated hyperperfusion in a non-territorial distribution, most compatible with ictal or peri-ictal hyperemia rather than a primary venous congestion pattern. Four patients had favorable neurological recovery, whereas one patient had a poor short-term outcome likely driven primarily by large baseline hemorrhage. These cases highlight that perfusion abnormalities in CVST should be interpreted differently from arterial stroke and may be most useful when stratified into venous congestion, venous infarction, and seizure-related hyperperfusion patterns.

Indexed as

cerebral venous sinus thrombosisperfusion imagingvenous ischemia

Identifiers

PMID42305011
PMCPMC13275504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.