Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304989›Full record

ArticleZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics2026

[Expert consensus on artificial intelligence-assisted monitoring and management of neonatal jaundice in primary medical institutions (2026)].

Subspecialty Group of Neonatology, Society of Pediatrics, Chinese Medical Association

Abstract readConsensus StatementEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Subspecialty Group of Neonatology, Society of Pediatrics, Chinese Medical Association

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on the current application status and existing challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) in the management of neonatal jaundice in primary medical institutions in China, a multidisciplinary expert panel was convened, including specialists from neonatology, pediatrics, child healthcare, obstetrics, public health, information management, and health administration, to develop the "Expert consensus on artificial intelligence-assisted monitoring and management of neonatal jaundice in primary medical institutions (2026)". This consensus focuses on how AI-assisted monitoring and management can empower early identification, risk assessment, and hierarchical referral of neonatal jaundice in primary medical institutions. It aims to improve the efficiency of early detection and dynamic management, prevent severe hyperbilirubinemia-especially bilirubin encephalopathy-and related adverse outcomes. The consensus addresses six clinical questions and proposes sixteen recommendations, providing standardized scientific guidance for primary healthcare providers in the implementation of AI-assisted monitoring and management of neonatal jaundice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceJaundice, NeonatalHumansInfant, NewbornArtificial intelligence-assisted monitoring and managementHyperbilirubinemiaNeonatal jaundiceNeonatePrimary medical institution

Identifiers

PMID42304989
PMCPMC13273534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.