Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304946›Full record

Observational studyCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2026

Early Outcomes Between the Two Latest Generation Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Devices: OCEAN-Mitral Registry.

Yusuke Enta, Masanori Yamamoto, Hirofumi Hioki, Shunsuke Kubo, Mike Saji, Masahiko Asami, Shinichi Shirai, Masaki Izumo, Shingo Mizuno, Yusuke Watanabe and 14 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Yusuke EntaDepartment of Cardiology, Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1931-1012
Masanori YamamotoDepartment of Cardiology, Toyohashi Heart Center, Toyohashi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5210-6382
Hirofumi HiokiDepartment of Cardiology, IMS Tokyo Katsushika General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7189-8450
Shunsuke KuboDepartment of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4794-7843
Mike SajiDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-109X
Masahiko AsamiDivision of Cardiology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2102-033X
Shinichi ShiraiDivision of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4764-8205
Masaki IzumoDivision of Cardiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.
Shingo MizunoDepartment of Cardiology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yusuke WatanabeDepartment of Cardiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki IzumiDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto AmakiDepartment of Heart Failure and Transplant Division of Heart Failure, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5132-5129
Kazuhisa KodamaDivision of Cardiology, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Cardiovascular Center, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hisao OtsukiDepartment of Cardiology, Tokyo Woman's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0976-1319
Daisuke HachinoheDepartment of Cardiology, Sapporo Heart Center, Sapporo Cardio Vascular Clinic, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4828-1836
Toru NaganumaDepartment of Cardiology, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4501-1358
Hiroki BotaDepartment of Cardiology, Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yohei OhnoDepartment of Cardiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4203-7613
Shinya OkazakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi UenoSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9747-2511
Gaku NakazawaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6721-1342
Toshiaki OtsukaDepartment of Hygiene and Public Health, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7994-7594
Kentaro HayashidaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1750-1982
OCEAN‐Mitral investigators

Funding

Abbott Medical JapanBoston Scientific JapanDaiichi-SankyoEdwards LifesciencesMedtronic Japan
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PASCAL (PASCAL Precision, Edwards Lifesciences) device for mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) was recently introduced in Japan for treating primary mitral regurgitation (PMR). This multicenter study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of the latest-generation M-TEER systems: PASCAL and MitraClip (Generation 4, Abbott Vascular).

methodsData from 150 consecutive patients with significant PMR who underwent M-TEER with the PASCAL were extracted from the Japanese OCEAN-Mitral registry. The early procedural safety and clinical outcomes of PASCAL were compared with those of a historical cohort of 679 patients treated with MitraClip for PMR. Propensity score (PS)-matching analysis was performed to minimize differences in baseline characteristics.

resultsAmong the PASCAL cohort, one case of 30-day non-cardiac mortality occurred, with no deployment failures or need for additional surgery. A single leaflet device attachment (SLDA) case occurred after releasing one of the two PASCAL lockline sutures; however, successful retrieval of the device resulted in no final SLDA cases. After PS-matching, the rates of MR grade ≤ 2+ were comparable between the groups at 30-day (92.3% vs. 92.1%, p = 0.89). Similarly, rates of MR ≤ 1+ showed no significant differences at 30-day (71.6% vs. 65.8%, p = 0.18). Both the device and clinical success rates were similar between the groups (95.0% vs. 92.1%, p = 0.33; 93.5% vs. 87.8%, p = 0.10, respectively).

conclusionsThis study revealed no significant differences in the early clinical outcomes after M-TEER between the latest-generation devices. The PASCAL system, with its distinctive structure, may be associated with a low incidence of SLDA and may represent a potential alternative option for the treatment of PMR. CLINICAL TRIALS: OCEAN-Mitral registry (UMIN-ID: UMIN000023653).

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationMitral ValveMitral Valve InsufficiencyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHemodynamicsHumansJapanMaleProsthesis DesignRecovery of FunctionRegistriesRetrospective StudiesMitraClip G4mitral regurgitationmitral valve transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repairPASCAL precisionprimary mitral regurgitation

Identifiers

PMID42304946
PMCPMC13532480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.