Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304834›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2026

Model-Enabled Knowledge Transfer Across Cell Lines, Culture Scales and Conditions.

Luxi Yu, Antonio Del Rio Chanona, Cleo Kontoravdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luxi YuDepartment of Chemical Engineering, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Antonio Del Rio ChanonaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Cleo KontoravdiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0213-4830

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanistic models are central to quantitative understanding and optimization of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell culture processes, but their utility is often restricted by parameter sets calibrated for specific cell lines, scales, or operating conditions. In this study, we present the application of the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) to bioprocessing, introducing an ensemble-based framework for dual state and parameter estimation that enables mechanistic model adaptation across distinct systems. The EnKF recursively assimilates process measurements to update uncertain kinetic parameters and predict system states. This allows a model calibrated for one system to be transferred to another without reparameterization, using only a single experimental dataset. The evolving parameter ensembles provide a time-resolved sensitivity analysis that identifies which parameters have dominant influence under new process conditions and when their effects become significant. The framework was evaluated across six CHO cell datasets spanning different scales, cell lines, temperatures, and feeding strategies. It accurately reconstructed system dynamics and showed progressive improvement in long-term predictions as data accumulated. By maintaining full mechanistic transparency while flexibly adapting to new data, the EnKF offers a practical route for knowledge transfer across systems, strengthening the role of mechanistic modeling in data-informed bioprocess understanding and control.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesModels, BiologicalAnimalsCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusbioprocess modelingensemble Kalman filterknowledge transferstate estimation

Identifiers

PMID42304834
PMCPMC13576805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.