Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304812›Full record

ReviewElectrophoresis2026

CMOS Electrokinetic Systems and Fabrication Approaches for On-CMOS 3D Electrodes.

Lewis Keeble

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Electrophoresis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lewis KeebleUniversité Marie et Louis Pasteur, SUPMICROTECH, CNRS, Institut FEMTO-ST, Besançon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8267-708X

Funding

EIPHI Graduate School ANR-17-EURE-0002European Regional Development Fund BFC000802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrokinetics, including dielectrophoresis, electroosmosis and other phenomena, have become a popular technique for manipulating particles on the microscale using electric fields. Concurrently, CMOS microchips have become the dominant global technology. The combination of electrokinetics with CMOS appears ideal, as both utilise electric potentials, with the ability to make highly functional and scalable actuating systems. Since the first demonstration of electrokinetics implemented as part of a CMOS system in 2003, 49 further studies were published. But whilst the first study led to a commercialised product, those that followed have not achieved the same success. This review surveys the available literature on CMOS-based electrokinetic systems and highlight key trends in design. The obstacles blocking the field from greater success are explored and opportunities are identified, with future perspectives provided throughout. The review shows that, currently, the foremost limitation for CMOS-based electrokinetic systems lies with the front-end-namely, the electrode systems being employed. The need to extend beyond the planar configurations currently being used and fabricate 3D electrodes on-CMOS that can operate within high conductivity environments is put forward. This discussion then leads into a review on fabrication approaches for 3D electrodes with a specific focus on those compatible with a CMOS system.

Indexed as

ElectrophoresisSemiconductorsElectrodesElectroosmosisEquipment DesignactuationCMOSdielectrophoresiselectric fieldelectrokineticselectroosmosis

Identifiers

PMID42304812
PMCPMC13480728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.