Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304804›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology2026

Examining the Measurement and Validity of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale and Its Short Forms.

Rachel S Faulkenberry, Adam D Hicks, Brianna M Byllesby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel S FaulkenberryWestern Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-6688-7614
Adam D HicksWestern Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9086-0394
Brianna M ByllesbyUniversity of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4149-8963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion regulation is a transdiagnostic development and maintenance factor for internalizing and externalizing psychopathology, and one popular measure of emotion dysregulation is the 36-item Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Due to psychometric issues and concerns with length, research with the DERS has produced multiple short forms of the scale. The present study, using a convenience sample of 618 college students with measures administered online, aimed to examine and compare all DERS versions to identify the best fitting model. Each of the five versions of the DERS was examined using a series of confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), including both correlated factors models and bifactor models, as appropriate. The bifactor DERS-18 model was determined to be the best fitting model, and it was retained for subsequent analyses. In keeping with similar studies, findings indicated that the awareness factor was not well defined. Next, the specific factors and the general factor of the DERS-18 were correlated with the scale scores of the MMPI-3 to examine the relationships with psychopathology. The specific factors, but not the general factor alone, were related to internalizing MMPI-3 scale scores; however, the DERS-18 factors had low or nonsignificant correlations with externalizing scales. Results suggested that in a large non-clinical sample, the DERS-18 was primarily associated with internalizing psychopathology at the latent level, so it may be more appropriate for use in assessing internalizing distress rather than associations with external behaviors.

Indexed as

Affective SymptomsEmotional RegulationPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsAdolescentAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultconfirmatory factor analysisemotion dysregulationpersonality assessmentpsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID42304804
PMCPMC13441351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.