ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Free-Breathing Fat Quantification Using a Phase Error-Corrected Cartesian Acquisition With Spiral Profile Ordering.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a phase-corrected time-interleaved multi-echo gradient echo Cartesian acquisition with spiral profile ordering (TIMGRECASPR) for abdominal large-FOV proton density fat fraction (PDFF) mapping at 3 T, demonstrating its sampling flexibility and inherent self-gating capabilities at high isotropic resolutions.
methodsA methodological framework was developed to correct eddy current- and concomitant gradient-related phase errors in a TIMGRECASPR acquisition. Sequence parameters were optimized with an XCAT simulation. Validation was conducted in phantoms and in vivo thigh and abdominal imaging. In five healthy volunteers, liver PDFF and T2*, alongside pancreatic PDFF, were compared to a clinical Cartesian breath-hold vendor technique. Liver PDFF homogeneity was evaluated visually and across five different axial subvolumes. Mean absolute PDFF bias and within-subject standard deviation (wSD) across repeated scans were quantified. Pancreatic delineation was quantified by line profiles across the tissue boundary.
resultsShort shot lengths were required for a sufficient temporal resolution of the respiratory motion self-navigation. Without phase corrections, data showed severe peripheral PDFF bias, especially at higher spatial resolutions. In a water phantom, PDFF bias ranged from -5% to 5% over 400 mm in readout direction, successfully mitigated by the proposed phase corrections. Liver PDFF maps exhibited improved homogeneity and accurate quantification results, verified by the breath-hold reference scan (0.6% PDFF bias, wSD = 0.11%). Pancreatic boundaries were clearly visualized and provided accurate pancreatic PDFF maps (1.1% PDFF bias, wSD = 0.37%).
conclusionThis work demonstrates the feasibility of a free-breathing monopolar time-interleaved gradient echo sequence based on a Cartesian spiral acquisition at 3 T when accounting for phase errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.