Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304696›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2026

Relationship between carina size and sternum morphology in birds reflects physical constraints of body size and flight style.

D C Deeming

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

D C DeemingJoseph Banks Laboratories, School of Natural Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9587-6149

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The avian sternum is the largest bone in the body to accommodate the large muscles required for flight. Previous analysis showed that variation in keel and sternum morphology only weakly reflected body size and flight style and implied that variation in caudal metasternum morphology was associated with expansion of bony trabeculae in some species. This study used area measurements to explore the idea that, to minimise body mass, variation in keel size was inversely correlated with variation in the shape of the metasternum. Data for sternum dimensions and area were collected from digital images of pectoral girdles and the sternum in articulation of 62 species representing 10 different orders. The keel area was expressed as a proportion of the total sternum area, and the area of the sternum from the ventral aspect occupied by bone was expressed as a proportion of the assumed maximum possible bone area. Phylogenetically controlled linear modelling explored the effects of body mass, order, sternum type and flight style. Sternum area and keel area exhibited isometric relationships with body mass which had different intercepts for each order. Proportional keel area was inversely related to body mass in some but not all orders. The proportional bone area exhibited a positive relationship with body mass and there was a significant effect of order. Proportional keel area exhibited a negative relationship with the proportional bone area. Both sternum type and flight style significantly affected proportional keel area and the proportional bone area. It was concluded that to save body mass, an increase in bone mass associated with the development of a keel has been mitigated by bone not developing (rather than extension of existing bone) in the caudal metasternum. Such patterns would also explain observed variation in sternum morphology in Mesozoic birds.

Indexed as

flight stylekeel areasternum areasternum morphologytaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID42304696
PMCPMC13398643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.