ArticlePsycho-oncology2026
Global Qualitative Study of Professionals' Perspectives of Caring for People With Head and Neck Cancer Experiencing Suicidal Ideation.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, people with head and neck cancer (HNC) are twice as likely to die by suicide compared to all other cancers. Yet most HNC suicidality studies focus on estimating prevalence, rather than how to assess and support people with suicidal ideation within routine cancer care. This study aimed to explore professionals' perspectives of how to optimally identify, refer and support people with HNC reporting suicidal ideation.
methodsThirty-nine, semi-structured interviews were conducted with health and social care professionals caring from people with HNC from 13 countries; and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
findingsThree multilevel influences were identified: (1) patient risk factors: from identity disruption to demoralisation, (2) role ambiguity and emotional burden for professionals, and (3) sociocultural influences relating to suicidal ideation for people with HNC. Despite a divergence in confidence across professional roles, participants acknowledged a need to screen for suicidal ideation, prioritising diagnosis, early post-treatment, when late-effects are prevalent (12-24 months), alongside trigger-based screening. Barriers to implementation include a lack of professional knowledge and confidence, referral pathways and timely access to psychological care. Professionals highlighted the emotional demands and moral injury, identifying the need for suicide prevention training and clinical supervision.
conclusionTo enhance suicidality management for people with HNC, there is a necessity for clinician-led needs-based psychosocial assessment, collaborative safety planning, and clear, stepped-care referral pathways with integrated psycho-oncology services. Workforce needs include suicide prevention training and structured clinical supervision. Proactive suicide prevention should be a public health priority given this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.