Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304659›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in critical care2026

The leaky gut and microbiome in critical illness: emerging insights into microbial "translocation".

Nikki C Daniels, Elizabeth A Wilson, Mara A Serbanescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nikki C DanielsDuke University School of Medicine.
Elizabeth A WilsonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Mara A SerbanescuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Unraveling effects of gut and blood microbial signatures on immune phenotypes and organ dysfunction in sepsisR35GM156920 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Mara Alexandra Serbanescu · 2025 to 2026
$808k
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM156920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMicrobial translocation has long been viewed as a nonspecific consequence of gut barrier failure in critical illness, with downstream effects attributed primarily to the host immune response. This review examines emerging evidence that the gut microbiome plays a more active and specific role in this process than previously appreciated. RECENT

findingsDysbiosis during critical illness directly contributes to barrier dysfunction through depletion of metabolites that sustain epithelial integrity. Culture-independent approaches have revealed that gut-derived organisms are a major reservoir for secondary infection, with translocation governed by microbial virulence, community dynamics, and immune cell-mediated transport rather than barrier permeability alone. In parallel, organism-specific microbial components - including structurally diverse forms of lipopolysaccharide and bacterial DNA detected across multiple blood fractions - enter the circulation and differentially modulate host immune responses. Recent studies link circulating microbial DNA composition to distinct inflammatory phenotypes in sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome, suggesting these signals contribute to clinical heterogeneity. SUMMARY: These findings support a revised framework in which translocation reflects the composition of the dysbiotic gut, not barrier integrity alone. Integrating microbial data with host phenotyping may enable more precise risk stratification and microbiome-informed therapeutic strategies in critical illness.

Indexed as

Bacterial TranslocationCritical IllnessDysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeSepsisHumansIntestinal Barrier Functioncritical illnessICUleaky gutmicrobiometranslocation

Identifiers

PMID42304659
PMCPMC13367123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.