ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2026
Improving Linkage to the HCV Care Cascade in Nonspecialist Settings: Evaluation of the Performance and Triage Utility of the Elecsys HCV Duo Assay in Japan.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Performance of the Elecsys HCV Duo Immunoassay Compared with a Standard-of-Care Algorithm Using Alinity Anti-HCV Screening and HCV RNA Confirmation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn Japan, the hepatitis C virus (HCV) care cascade is constrained at the transition from anti-HCV antibody screening to confirmatory HCV ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) testing in nonspecialist departments. As HCV prevalence declines and the population ages, the two-step antibody-to-RNA algorithm becomes less efficient and vulnerable to loss to follow-up. We evaluated whether the Elecsys HCV Duo assay could function as a triage test to strengthen linkage to care.
methodsWe conducted a two-part study in Kumamoto Prefecture, Japan. First, a survey of 19 specialized institutions assessed hepatitis virus testing practices and downstream evaluation in nonspecialist departments. Second, 479 serum samples from patients undergoing HCV RNA quantification at four hospitals were prospectively evaluated using the Elecsys HCV Duo assay, with detection rates stratified by viral load.
resultsNonspecialist departments accounted for 86.6% of in-hospital anti-HCV testing; however, among 1416 anti-HCV-positive individuals identified outside gastroenterology departments, only 22.7% underwent confirmatory HCV RNA testing. In the prospective evaluation of 479 samples, HCVcAg sensitivity and specificity versus HCV RNA were 62.8% and 99.8%, respectively. Detection rates increased with viral load, from 0% at ≤ 4.0 log
conclusionA vulnerability in the HCV care cascade lies at the transition from screening to confirmatory evaluation in nonspecialist settings. When implemented as a triage test within referral pathways, the Elecsys HCV Duo assay may improve linkage to specialist care while reserving HCV RNA testing for downstream confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.