ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Assessment of Multiple Prognostic Scores in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving First-Line, Immune-Based Combinations.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCombination immunotherapy is widely used as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but pretreatment prognostic stratification remains insufficiently established.
aimsTo evaluate the performance of various prognostic scores in the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with combination immunotherapy. METHODS AND
resultsWe retrospectively analyzed 145 patients who started first-line combination immunotherapy at six institutions from December 2015 to February 2025. We calculated IMDC, LIPI, RMH, PMHI, GRIm, C-PLAN, mGPS, and Meet-URO scores and performed survival (PFS, OS) and ROC analyses (PD, ORR). Survival analyses also evaluated the prognostic ability of each score by concordance index. At a median follow-up period of 28.8 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 35.1 months and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences for all scores except between IMDC and C-PLAN (PFS) and IMDC and mGPS (OS). Among these, PMHI and RMH demonstrated superior results in the C-index. ROC analysis showed no score had prognostic value for PD or ORR.
conclusionPMHI and RMH may be useful prognostic scores for survival outcomes in mRCC patients treated with immunotherapy. However, their ability to predict treatment efficacy (ORR and PD) is limited and further research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.