ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2026
Shaping the extinction burst: Increasing its probability and preventing its emergence across topographies.
Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shaping the extinction burst: Increasing its probability and preventing its emergence across topographies.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026Article
- Behavioral history effects on the maintenance of schedule-induced drinking in rats.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extinction bursts are traditionally described as transient increases in response rate following the discontinuation of reinforcement. However, their underlying mechanisms remain under debate. This study examined whether extinction bursts are modulated by the contingencies across multiple extinction exposures. Reinforcement contingencies were manipulated to assess whether extinction bursts increased or decreased in probability through repeated exposures to extinction, where bursts were differentially followed or not by subsequent access to food reinforcement. Twenty rats received a high-magnitude reinforcer (three pellets) under a fixed-ratio 1 schedule. Results showed that when extinction bursts were reinforced by regaining access to the reinforcement schedule, bursts persisted over successive extinction exposures, whereas repeated exposure without reinforcement led to the progressive decline of bursts. Crucially, extinction bursts did not emerge with a new response topography, suggesting that prior extinction exposure prevents their generalization to novel responses. This finding may have significant translational value for the design of interventions to minimize undesired extinction bursts across contexts or response topographies. The overall pattern of results indicates that extinction bursts are a learned phenomenon, shaped by reinforcement history and discrimination processes, and provide a basis for strategies to either promote or prevent their occurrence, depending on experimental or applied objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.