ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2026
Psychosocial outcomes of group-based physical activity among individuals with substance use disorders: a scoping review.
Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exercise Training Characteristics and Psycho-Bio-Chemical Outcomes in Individuals with Addictive Behaviours: A Scoping Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Substance use disorders (SUDs) are increasing globally, and social support as well as access to substance-free activities are essential for sustained recovery. Mental health services should therefore be effective, accessible, and supportive of psychosocial functioning. The aim of this scoping review was to map the extent of research examining psychosocial outcomes associated with group-based physical activity among individuals with SUDs and to identify psychosocial factors reported to enhance the reinforcing value of such activities. In addition, the review assessed the extent to which included studies emphasized interaction, communication, cooperation, and group cohesion, and whether interventions were delivered alongside other psychosocial treatments. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, searches were conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for publications from 2010 to 2025. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Across studies, psychosocial factors such as structured and inclusive environments, professional guidance, perceived autonomy, and social support were commonly reported as contributing to engagement and positive psychosocial outcomes associated with group-based physical activity. However, relatively few studies explicitly emphasized group-level processes, and most interventions were delivered in combination with other psychosocial treatments, limiting the ability to isolate group-specific effects. This review highlights a knowledge gap concerning the social components of group-based physical activity interventions and their role in shaping psychosocial outcomes among individuals with SUDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.