ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Comparison of the efficacy of the oXiris filter and the ST-100 filter in patients with postoperative cardiac surgery infections combined with acute kidney injury: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveComparison of the efficacy of the oXiris filter and the ST-100 filter in patients with postoperative cardiac surgery infections combined with acute kidney injury.
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of patients with postoperative cardiac surgical infections combined with acute kidney injury who underwent continuous renal replacement therapy from January 2023 to April 2024 in the Critical Care Medicine Centre of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. Based on the application of different filters, they were divided into the oXiris group and the ST-100 group, and the general condition, clinical data and related indexes of the two groups were collected at baseline (T0), 10 h after treatment (T1), 24 h after treatment (T2) and 48 h after treatment (T3), respectively, to compare the treatment effect, length of hospital stay and outcome events of the two groups at T1, T2 and T3, to explore the different therapeutic values of oXiris filter and ST-100 filter.
resultsA total of 33 patients were included, 11 (n = 11) in the oXiris group and 22 (n = 22) in the ST group.Intra-group comparisons between the two groups: of norepinephrine dose (F
conclusionThis study indicates the oXiris filter effectively removes inflammatory mediators in patients with postoperative infections and acute kidney injury(characteristically manifested in the first 10 h), compared to the ST-100 filter. It also aids hemodynamic stability and reduces vasopressor doses, but shows no statistical improvement in organ function or patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.