ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026
tRF and gastric cancer: molecular mechanism exploration and novel strategies for precision diagnosis and therapy.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and current diagnostic biomarkers lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity. tRNA-derived fragments (tRFs), an emerging class of non-coding RNAs, have garnered attention for their stability and regulatory roles in carcinogenesis. MAIN BODY: This review adopts a comparative perspective to evaluate the distinctive roles of tRFs in GC relative to other non-coding RNAs, particularly microRNAs (miRNAs). We summarize tRF biogenesis and classification, highlighting their unique mechanistic repertoire that encompasses both AGO2-dependent gene silencing and non-canonical protein interactions. Dysregulated tRF profiles in patient samples reveal promising diagnostic candidates (e.g., tRF-23-Q99P9P9NDD, tRF-17-18VBY9M) that demonstrate superior performance to conventional markers. However, we critically examine translational barriers including functional heterogeneity, detection challenges, and the absence of registered clinical trials. We also dissect sources of contradictory findings and propose standardized frameworks for future investigation.
conclusionstRFs represent functionally versatile regulators with distinct advantages over miRNAs in diagnostic applications. Their clinical translation requires overcoming methodological standardization gaps and evidence thresholds through interdisciplinary efforts integrating multi-omics profiling, advanced delivery systems, and rigorous clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.