Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304461›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Peer pressure and fear of missing out among university students in the social media environment: the influence mechanism of self‑authenticity.

Hanqiang Li, Xiangwen Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hanqiang LiUCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia.
Xiangwen JiUCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia. 2728782894@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFear of Missing Out (FoMO) and Peer Pressure are intertwined among university students and are highly associated with Social Media Addiction. This study explores the potential moderating role of Self-Authenticity in the associations among peer pressure, social media-related factors, and FoMO.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was administered to 397 Chinese university students. Five variables were measured: Self-Authenticity, Peer Pressure, Social Media Addiction, Online Social Comparison, and FoMO. Structural equation modeling (SEM) and moderation analyses were utilized to examine the structural relationships among these variables.

resultsSocial Media Addiction and Online Social Comparison exhibited indirect association patterns between Peer Pressure and FoMO. Self-Authenticity demonstrated significant negative predictive effects on all variables in the model. Additionally, Self-Authenticity negatively moderated the association between Peer Pressure and FoMO (where the direct predictive path became non-significant after its inclusion), while demonstrating positive moderating effects on the associations from Peer Pressure to Social Media Addiction, and from Social Media Addiction to Online Social Comparison.

conclusionSelf-Authenticity is negatively associated with baseline levels of peer pressure, social media-related risks, and FoMO. Grounded in the S-O-R framework, the study highlights Self-Authenticity as a key individual-level variable that moderates the statistical associations among external pressures, digital behaviors, and psychological states. Given the cross-sectional design, these findings represent structural associations rather than causal mechanisms.

Indexed as

FearPeer GroupSelf ConceptSocial MediaStudentsAdolescentAdultBehavior, AddictiveChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDigital MediaFemaleHumansMaleMedia ExposureSocial ComparisonFoMOPeer PressureSelf-AuthenticitySocial comparisonSocial media

Identifiers

PMID42304461
PMCPMC13508344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.