ArticleJournal of cannabis research2026
Cannabis tourism in transition: operators' perspectives on regulatory change and governance in Bangkok, Thailand.
Article in Journal of cannabis research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study examines the perceptions and lived experiences of cannabis business operators in Bangkok as they navigated Thailand's rapid transition from decriminalization in 2022 to a subsequent medical-only regulatory reversal.
methodsUsing a qualitative design, the researchers conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 13 key informants in Bangkok between 2024 and 2025. Participants included retail shop operators (n = 8), farm operators (n = 3), and policy advocates (n = 2). Data were analyzed using the six-phase Thematic Analysis framework supported by ATLAS.ti Version 21.
resultsFive primary themes emerged: (1) Navigating Regulatory Unpredictability and Legal Uncertainty; (2) Structural Inequity and Enforcement Disparities; (3) Market Segmentation and Economic Drivers; (4) Adaptation and Survival Strategies; and (5) Socio-Cultural Perceptions and Public Health. Analysis revealed that while international tourists comprise approximately 60% of the market, domestic customers (40%) are primarily motivated by therapeutic needs. Furthermore, the study synthesized six domains for evidence-based policy, including regulatory formalization, equity promotion, and sustainable cannabis tourism development.
conclusionsThe findings highlight that regulatory instability and the absence of a comprehensive Cannabis and Hemp Act place a disproportionate burden on small Thai operators, creating structural inequities. Additionally, in the absence of formal public health infrastructure, operators have emerged as informal harm reduction actors through proactive customer education and safety guidance. These results offer actionable insights for other jurisdictions navigating similar cannabis policy transitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.