Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304422›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Psychometric evaluation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Persian version of the Relocation Stress Syndrome Scale - Short Form (RSSS-SF) in patients transferred from intensive care units to general wards.

Sajjad Soofi, Masoumeh Zakerimoghadam, Melika Zoroufchi, Özkan Görgülü, Ali Shafahi, Sahar Khoshkesht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sajjad SoofiDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8992-7991
Masoumeh ZakerimoghadamDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9762-1887
Melika ZoroufchiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5354-6119
Özkan GörgülüDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6802-4450
Ali ShafahiCancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sahar KhoshkeshtNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. s.khoshkesht@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6527-1675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe transition from intensive care units to general wards is a critical and stressful phase in patient recovery, often associated with adverse psychological and clinical outcomes. Relocation Stress Syndrome (RSS) is a recognized condition resulting from this transition, highlighting the need for valid and culturally adapted assessment tools to accurately measure patient stress and guide nursing interventions.

methodsThis methodological study was conducted to adapt and validate the Persian version of the Relocation Stress Syndrome Scale-Short Form (RSSS-SF). The final Persian version was administered to 155 patients who had been transferred from intensive care units (ICUs) to general wards in Tehran hospitals. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 29 and AMOS 24.Item-total correlations, Cronbach's alpha coefficients, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted to examine internal consistency and factor structure. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was subsequently performed to test the goodness-of-fit of the model. Model fit indices (χ²/df, CFI, GFI, AGFI, IFI, and RMSEA) and reliability coefficients were evaluated according to standard psychometric criteria.

resultsExploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure for the Persian version of the RSSS-SF, explaining 57.97% of the total variance. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value (0.74) and Bartlett's test of sphericity (χ² = 419.33, p < .001) confirmed sampling adequacy. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated acceptable model fit (χ²/df = 2.13, CFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.07). The overall internal consistency of the scale was acceptable. (Cronbach's α = 0.83).

conclusionIn summary, the Persian version of the RSSS-SF demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability, generally supporting the factorial structure of the original instrument. The scale is a practical and culturally appropriate tool for assessing relocation stress among Iranian ICU patients and can facilitate the development of patient-centered, family-integrated nursing strategies to improve post-transfer adaptation and recovery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery (Ethics Code: IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1404.026). All participants were fully informed regarding the study objectives and procedures, and written informed consent was obtained prior to participation. Participation was voluntary, and confidentiality and anonymity of the collected data were assured. The study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable. TRIAL STATUS: Data collection for this study was conducted between June 2025 and November 2025. All 155 participants completed the Persian short-form RSSS during the study period.

Indexed as

Cross-cultural adaptationIntensive care unitePatient transferPsychometricRelocation stress

Identifiers

PMID42304422
PMCPMC13536698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.