ArticleParasites & vectors2026
Susceptibility of Rhipicephalus microplus to fluralaner: assessment before and after implementation of a strategic control protocol in taurine cattle in a tropical region.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFluralaner has been used in the strategic control of the Rhipicephalus microplus tick, an important ectoparasite for cattle farming. However, the effects of its application on the susceptibility profiles of these tick populations after treatment have not yet been investigated. In this study, we evaluated the effect of a strategic control protocol with fluralaner on the phenotypic susceptibility profile of a population of R. microplus before and after its implementation.
methodsThirty naturally infested cattle were divided into two experimental groups: T01 (control group): cattle treated with a topical (spray) formulation containing a synthetic pyrethroid and two organophosphates; T02 (strategic control): cattle treated with a formulation (pour-on) containing only fluralaner. For group T01, animals were treated when the average tick count was ≥30 to allow determination of the infestation challenge on the farm, while animals in group T02 were treated when 30% of the animals had adult ticks < 4 mm. Tick counts on animals were performed every 7 days for 266 days. Larvae monitoring in the pasture was performed every 30 days using a dragging flannel for 240 days. Larval immersion tests (LIT) and adult immersion tests (AIT) were used to assess the phenotypic susceptibility profile of ticks before and after the implementation of the strategic control protocol over a tick season in a tropical region.
resultsThe animals in the group treated with fluralaner (T02) had lower mean tick counts (p ≤ 0.05) than those observed in the control group (T01) in 35 of the 38 evaluations during the 266 days of the study. In the pasture, the number of larvae in T02 was lower (p < 0.05) in seven of the eight evaluations. There was no increase in LC50 values for larvae and engorged females after using the strategic control protocol with fluralaner for 9 months.
conclusionsThe use of the strategic control protocol with fluralaner resulted in a significant reduction in tick numbers on cattle and in pastures, and after 1 year of use, the population remained susceptible to this compound. No upward trend in LC50 values was observed after 9 months of fluralaner use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.