ArticleBMC nursing2026
Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Turkish version of the Thriving in Nursing Questionnaire.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Thriving in Nursing Questionnaire, which is specifically designed for nurses, in Turkish.
methodsThe study conducted between May and July 2025, participating nurses were asked to complete the 'Sociodemographic Information Form' and the 'Thriving in Nursing Questionnaire'. Considering a potential 10% data loss, the aim was to survey 165 nurses. A total of 164 nurses who completed all the survey items were included in the study sample. Those who did not consent to participate, had worked at the hospital for less than six months or incompletely answered the survey items were excluded from the study.
resultsBased on the confirmatory factor analysis, the modified three-factor model demonstrated acceptable-to-good fit (χ²/df = 1.544, RMSEA = 0.058, NFI = 0.904, CFI = 0.963, IFI = 0.964, and TLI = 0.953).
conclusionThe validity and reliability tests conducted in this study determined that the Thriving in Nursing Questionnaire is a valid and reliable measurement tool for the Turkish population. It is also believed that the scale will contribute significantly to improving the nursing workforce by enabling nurse managers to better understand these factors in management processes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.