ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy and full sternotomy approaches for Wheat procedure: a propensity-matched comparison.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs the prevalence and technological advancements of minimally invasive heart surgery continue to increase, aortic valve replacement(AVR) via right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy (RAMT) has matured, however, problems associated with Wheat's procedure (replacement of the ascending aorta(AAR) concomitant AVR) via RAMT approach have not been reported. The objective of this study was to compare the surgical quality, postoperative outcomes, and patient safety in patients undergoing Wheat's procedure via Full sternotomy (FS) versus RAMT.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 163 patients who underwent Wheat procedure between January 2022 and December 2024. Out of the 163 patients, 59 underwent the Wheat procedure via a right anterior minimally invasive incision. After 1:1 propensity score matching, by comparing various intraoperative and postoperative indicators, the outcomes of patients undergoing RAMT and FS were compared.
resultsPropensity scores identified 43 patients per group with similar baseline profiles. The results from the propensity-matched cohort are as follows. Although patients in RAMT group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass (RAMT 167 ± 57 vs FS 141 ± 40 min; P = 0.04) and cross-clamp (RAMT 128 ± 39 vs FS 110 ± 29 min; P = 0.04) time, they experienced reduced intraoperative blood loss (RAMT 317 ± 147 vs FS 456 ± 229 ml; P = 0.005). No patients in the RAMT group required intraoperative conversion to Full sternotomy. There was no statistically difference in the in-hospital mortality between the two groups (0% and 0% in RAMT and FS, respectively). RAMT was correlated with a reduced incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (RAMT 3 [7.0%] vs FS 13 [23.3%]; P = 0.04). Receiving RAMT can lead to a reduction in postoperative NRS pain scores and an earlier discharge for patients. RAMT not only enables shorter incisions (RAMT 6.0 cm vs FS 15.2 cm; P < 0.001) but also has no impact on the size or type of the artificial valve or vessel implanted, thereby ensuring that the surgical effection is non-inferior to the FS group.
conclusionsIn the Wheat procedure, the perioperative outcomes of RAMT closely resemble those of full sternotomy, and may be transferred in the field of cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.