Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304358›Full record

SynthesisBMC surgery2026

Post-operative pain, nausea, vomiting and optic nerve sheath diameter following total intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia for adults undergoing robotic transabdominal surgery - a systematic review and meta- analysis.

Hasan Nawaz Tahir, Amna Iqbal Butt, Munazza Rehman, Ahmed Ibrahim AbdElneam, Ahmed Mohammed Al-Dhubaibi, Syeda Bushra Rizvi, Muhammad Kamran Khan, Salman Khalid Alotaibi, Ashraf Hamouda Abdel Hakim

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hasan Nawaz TahirCommunity Medicine, College of Medicine, Dwadimi Shaqra University, Dawadmi, Saudi Arabia.
Amna Iqbal ButtDepartment of Community Medicine, Sharif Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan. dr_amnawaqas@hotmail.com.
Munazza RehmanDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ahmed Ibrahim AbdElneamDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Shaqra University, Dwadimi, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Mohammed Al-DhubaibiMedical Student College of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Syeda Bushra RizviGeneral Surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Kamran KhanSurgery, College of Medicine, Shaqra University, Dawadmi, Saudi Arabia.
Salman Khalid AlotaibiMedical Education College of Medicine, Dawadmi, Shaqra University, Dawadmi, Saudi Arabia.
Ashraf Hamouda Abdel HakimCollege of Medicine, Dwadimi Shaqra University, Dwadimi, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe introduction of robotic-assisted abdominal surgery is aimed at reducing the primary and secondary adverse outcomes. Anesthesia in robotic surgery varies from anesthesia for open or laparoscopic surgical procedures. The choice of anesthesia influences the perioperative control of pain, nausea, vomiting, and Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). The purpose of this systematic review was to assess outcome variation in patients undergoing transabdominal robot-assisted surgery done under total intravenous anesthesia or inhalational anesthesia. METHODOLOGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Google Scholar (January, 2017 to June, 2024). Search terms included "Anesthesia", "Robotics", "prostatectomy", hysterectomy", "nephrectomy", "cholecystectomy" and "cystectomy" with the Boolean operators "AND" and "OR". We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including adults of both genders aged 18 years and above, who underwent transabdominal robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery and targeting the consequences related to TIVA or inhalational anesthesia. We reviewed titles and abstracts and proceeded to full-text articles of the eligible studies relevant to inclusion criteria. Mean and standard deviations with 95% CI were calculated. Forest plots were used to present data visually.

resultsSix studies (340 patients) were included. We found only one study in which post-operative pain was assessed and results favored intravenous anesthesia in robotic transabdominal surgery. Only two studies reported post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Both studies stated that PONV is reported in few patients in the inhalation anesthesia group. We found evidence suggesting that change in ONSD measurements at 10 min after induction (MD 0.04,95% CI -0.02 to 0.11 p = 0.19) and 40-60 min after Trendelenburg position (MD -0.26, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.17, p = 0.16) are much less in intravenous anesthesia group than in inhalation anesthesia group. Total intravenous anesthesia maintains the ONSD and hence the ICP better than inhalational anesthesia in robotic transabdominal surgery with CO

conclusionThis review concludes that TIVA is a better choice than inhalational anesthesia for transabdominal robotic-assisted surgery in urology, gynecology, and gastroenterology in both male and female patients.

Indexed as

AbdomenAnesthesia, InhalationAnesthesia, IntravenousOptic NervePostoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative PainRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultHumansInhalation anesthesiaIntravenous anesthesiaMeta-analysisNausea and vomitingOptic nerve sheathPostoperative painRoboticsSystematic reviewTransabdominal

Identifiers

PMID42304358
PMCPMC13508423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.