ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Procalcitonin levels as a predictor of antibiotic treatment in pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProcalcitonin is a useful screen for bacterial infection, but its utility in pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is unknown.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of DKA patients admitted to two pediatric hospitals in 2019-2023.
results116 admissions had available procalcitonin levels, of which in 32, patients were prescribed a complete antibiotics course and thus presumed to have a bacterial infection. More of the treated group were female (69% vs. 45%, p = 0.036), febrile (47% vs. 22%, p = 0.013), and/or had pneumonia on chest x-ray (30.8% vs. 4.76%, p = 0.023). Area under (AUC) a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for procalcitonin to predict clinically suspected infection was 0.51 (no predictive value), whereas a ROC curve using fever and C-reactive protein (CRP) as predictors had an AUC of 0.79. Including procalcitonin in this model did not improve AUC.
conclusionsCRP and fever are useful predictors for clinically suspected infection in DKA patients, but procalcitonin is not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.