Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304339›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

The family caregiver experience in palliative care pathways: a multidimensional framework.

Marzia Cettina Severino, Costanza Galli, Sabina De Rosis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marzia Cettina SeverinoInterdisciplinary Center in Health Science, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy. marziacettina.severino@santannapisa.it.
Costanza GalliPalliative Care Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Nord-Ovest, Tuscany Region, Italy.
Sabina De RosisDepartment of Law, Economics, and Human Sciences, University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily caregivers play an essential role across the life course of people, especially in delicate moments as the end-of-life, playing a central role in supporting and caring for terminal patients. Exploring the experience of family caregivers along this pathway is crucial to ensure a respectful, person-centered and high-quality experience with healthcare services, not only for patients but also for their caregivers. This study aimed to develop and validate collaboratively a multidimensional framework to explore the global experience of family caregivers across the palliative care pathways, through a multi-step participatory process involving professionals and caregivers.

methodThe study employed a mixed-methods design. A literature exploration was conducted to identify key dimensions of the caregiver experience along the palliative care pathway, which informed the development of a preliminary framework subsequently examined through a Delphi-derived consensus process. A purposive sample of Italian professionals and caregivers participated in the Delphi study and were asked to assess the perceived importance of each dimension of the preliminary framework. Data analysis further examined areas of convergence and divergence between the two groups. The Delphi process resulted in the development of a final framework. Both the preliminary and final frameworks were refined through a workshop involving a group of Italian palliative care experts.

resultsAs a result of the first phase, our multi-dimensional framework included six key dimensions (namely, 'Needs', 'Responses', 'Clarity and adequacy of information', 'Availability in case of need', 'Responses in the Home Context', 'Communication and involvement'), each with additional sub-dimensions. The Delphi study involved 37 participants, including 19 professionals and 18 caregivers. All dimensions consistently received high ratings already in the first round. Emotional needs, clarity of information, and communication were prioritized by all participants, with differences including caregivers' higher ratings for training and involvement, and professionals' emphasis on communication adequacy. Open-ended comments identified personal, professional, and organizational challenges, such as the emotional burden on caregivers, communication gaps, and a need for enhanced support services. In a follow-up workshop, practitioners discussed the results of the Delphi, proposing to adopt the framework for involving caregivers in a holistic evaluation of services, and in defining person-centered improvements.

conclusionsThis study provides a multidimensional framework of the family caregiver experience, developed and refined collaboratively by both professionals and caregivers. The framework represents a conceptual and operational structure that may inform caregiver experience assessment and service evaluation. Given its flexible design, the framework may be further examined and adapted in other healthcare systems. These findings provide actionable insights to refine palliative care practices and better align them with the lived experiences and priorities of caregivers and professionals.

Indexed as

CaregiversPalliative CareAdultDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedCaregiver experienceDelphi methodMultidimensional frameworkPalliative care pathwayParticipatory researchServices experience

Identifiers

PMID42304339
PMCPMC13520151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.