ArticleBMC oral health2026
Novel injectable and wet bonding bone adhesive: physicochemical characterization and biocompatibility evaluation.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBone defect repair is the common clinical dilemmas in surgery, whereas conventional repair materials are limited by poor wet bonding performance, inadequate biocompatibility or the need for secondary surgical removal. To address the above clinical challenges and material defects, this study developed a novel injectable bone adhesive suitable for wet conditions.
methodsA novel injectable wet-bonding bone adhesive (Bone Glue) was fabricated with bioactive glass, tetracalcium phosphate (TTCP), polyglycolic acid (PGA) fibers, phosphoserine (PS) and phosphate solution as raw materials. Its physicochemical properties were characterized, and in vitro cytotoxicity on L-929 cells was assessed by Methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay; 12-week subchronic systemic toxicity test in SD rats was performed to evaluate in vivo biosafety.
resultsThe Bone glue was injectable. Curing triggered structural cross-linking of Bone Glue, with its adhesive strength to titanium increasing from 0.91 ± 0.14 MPa (initial curing) to 1.26 ± 0.09 MPa (complete curing, P < 0.05). The extract maintained a near-physiological pH (7.30-7.35) for 72 h, and all concentrations exhibited > 70% L-929 cell viability. In vivo, no abnormal symptoms, pathological lesions or significant body weight differences were observed in the Bone Glue group, with minor hematological/biochemical variations within normal ranges.
conclusionsBone glue possesses favorable physicochemical properties and excellent in vitro/in vivo biocompatibility, which makes it a promising biomaterial for dental implant fixation and bone defect repair in minimally invasive clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.