Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304284›Full record

Observational studyBMC oral health2026

Timing of primary maxillary tooth eruption in preterm compared to term infants: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study.

Ariane Hohoff, Linda Bosse, Thomas Stamm, Jonas Q Schmid, Moritz Kanemeier

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00408746 (Prospective), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00408746 unknown statusnot on this map

Prospective (Multicentre) Epidemiologic Longitudinal Study of Orofacial Development of Preterm and Low Birthweight Infants Compared to Term Infants in Consideration of Perinatal, Biometrical, Nutritional, Functional and Parental Parameters

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital MuensterRan2003 to 2013Enrolled80ConditionsPremature Birth, Infant, Newborn, PregnancyArmspalatal development
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ariane Hohoff *Department of Orthodontics, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude W 30, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Linda Bosse *Department of Orthodontics, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude W 30, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Thomas StammDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude W 30, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Jonas Q SchmidDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude W 30, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Moritz KanemeierDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude W 30, Münster, 48149, Germany. kanemeier@uni-muenster.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReported eruption times of primary teeth in term and preterm infants are largely based on detection of visible tooth structure at the gingival level by parents, paediatricians, or dentists. Furthermore, there is a lack of quantitative data on primary tooth eruption velocity in the literature. This study aimed to compare eruption timing, eruption velocity, and maximum crown length by modelling longitudinal crown eruption trajectories in term and preterm infants.

methodsThis retrospective longitudinal cohort study included 100 infants (51 preterm, 49 full-term) who were followed from the first weeks after birth with quarterly assessments over four years. A total of 626 serial maxillary plaster casts were obtained as part of a prospective clinical trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00408746). The crown length of 1,885 primary teeth (central and lateral incisors, canines, first molars) was measured by one investigator on digitised casts using Blender software. Intrarater reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Timing and velocity of eruption were estimated using a non-linear asymptotic growth model.

resultsMeasurement reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.996). Comparing chronological age revealed that preterm infants had a mean eruption delay of 2.7 months compared to full-term infants, with a significant delay observed for canines (4.5 months). However, when corrected age (chronological age minus days born before 37 gestational weeks) was used, a mean delay of only 1.4 months with no significant differences was found. Model-derived eruption preceded commonly reported clinical eruption ages by 6.2 months in preterm and 7.7 months in full-term infants. The model-estimated maximum crown lengths were slightly smaller in preterm infants, though these differences were not statistically significant. Eruption velocity followed a non-linear pattern, with preterm infants showing a tendency towards higher eruption rates, suggesting catch-up growth.

conclusionsBased on our model, eruption timings reported in the literature likely correspond to clinical observations made when primary teeth have attained about half of their final crown height. Consequently, crown exposure through gingiva appears to occur on average about six months prior to clinically visible eruption. Although preterm infants show a delay in tooth eruption when assessed by their chronological age, this difference resolves after correction for prematurity.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureTooth, DeciduousTooth EruptionFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMaleMaxillaOdontometryRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTooth CrownPretermTermTooth eruption

Identifiers

PMID42304284
PMCPMC13273975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.