ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Parent-reported benefits, barriers, and experiences of augmentative and alternative communication use among children with autism in Nablus, Palestine: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren with autism may have communication needs that require individualized support. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) can support functional communication, but little is known about parent-reported AAC implementation in Palestine. This study examined parent-reported perceived benefits, barriers, and experiences of AAC use among children with autism in Nablus, Palestine.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 75 parents or primary caregivers of children with autism who were using or receiving structured AAC training. Participants were recruited from specialized autism centers in Nablus. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire covering child and family characteristics, perceived AAC benefits and barriers, and experiences during AAC implementation. The perceived benefit score was calculated from six yes/no items. The final AAC experience score was calculated from seven positively worded items after two negatively worded acceptance-difficulty items were analyzed separately. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Spearman's correlations were used.
resultsThe perceived AAC benefit score had a median of 6 (IQR 4-6) out of 6. The most frequently endorsed perceived benefit was increased communication opportunities (73/75, 97.3%), followed by perceived better behavior-related interaction inside the home (65/75, 86.7%) and improved understanding of the child's needs (64/74, 86.5%). Reported barriers included difficulty integrating AAC into daily routines (53/75, 70.7%) and difficulty accessing AAC programs (51/75, 68.0%). Awareness of alternative AAC systems was limited (25/75, 33.3%), and 23/74 parents/caregivers (31.1%) agreed that AAC systems are suitable for all children. The seven-item AAC experience score showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.841) and had a median of 16.0 (IQR 12.75-19.0) out of 21. A positive correlation was observed between perceived benefit score and AAC experience score (rs = 0.426, p < 0.001).
conclusionParents/caregivers commonly reported AAC-related perceived benefits, but barriers to access and daily integration were frequent and awareness of alternative systems was limited. Findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the cross-sectional parent-report design, but they support structured parent education, individualized AAC selection, and continued professional follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.