ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Spanish version of the Swimming with Independent Measure (SWIM).
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssessing aquatic functional abilities is essential for designing effective interventions for children and adolescents who undergo aquatic activities and/or therapy. However, there is a lack of validated instruments in Spanish addressing this need. The Swimming with Independent Measure (SWIM) assesses functional performance in aquatic environments across typical and atypical development. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and to evaluate content equivalence and face validity of the SWIM for use with Spanish-speaking professionals working in aquatic environments with children and adolescents.
methodA methodological study was conducted to perform the cross-cultural adaptation of the SWIM and evaluate its content equivalence and face validity. Cross-cultural adaptation followed Beaton's six-phase methodology: translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review, and pilot testing. Two translators and two back-translators performed the linguistic adaptation. A multidisciplinary expert committee (n = 5) evaluated content equivalence, and 20 professionals meeting predefined eligibility criteria participated in pilot testing. Content equivalence was assessed during the expert committee review, while face validity was evaluated during pilot testing.
resultsAfter two expert committee rounds, 83.6% of items were classified as conceptually equivalent and 16.4% as similar. Content equivalence indices improved from Ave-CVI = 0.93 to 1.00 and UA-CVI = 0.73 to 1.00. Pilot testing with 20 professionals confirmed adequate comprehensibility, requiring minor revisions to a few items. The final Spanish version showed adequate content equivalence and satisfactory face validity.
conclusionsThe Spanish version of the SWIM was cross-culturally adapted, demonstrating semantic, conceptual, idiomatic, and content equivalence with the original, and showed adequate face validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.