Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304243›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026

Recruiting children and young people with vision impairment for clinical research - experience from the SeeMyLife study.

Lisa Gittel, Robert P Finger, Verena Richter, Asmaa Cadi, Nicole Beck, Alice Colombo, Arvydas Gelžinis, Erika Gustafierro, Francesca Incagli, Agnė Kručaitė and 16 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Lisa GittelDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Robert P FingerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Verena RichterDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Asmaa CadiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Nicole BeckHôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Alice ColomboSC Neurologia, Salute Pubblica, Disabilità, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.
Arvydas GelžinisLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Erika GustafierroSC Neurologia, Salute Pubblica, Disabilità, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.
Francesca IncagliSC Neurologia, Salute Pubblica, Disabilità, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.
Agnė KručaitėLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Martina LanzaSC Neurologia, Salute Pubblica, Disabilità, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.
Matilde LeonardiSC Neurologia, Salute Pubblica, Disabilità, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.
Bart P LeroyDepartment of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dominika NowakowskaMedical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Katarzyna NowomiejskaMedical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Francesco ParmeggianiDepartment of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Valérie PelletierHôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Anais PhilippeHôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Maria Eleonora ReffoRobert Hollman Foundation, Padova, Italy.
Yaël SlaghmuylderDepartment of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Agnese SuppiejDepartment of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Chloé LaengHôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Reda ŽemaitienėLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Hélène DollfusHôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Jan H TerheydenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany. Jan.Terheyden@ukbonn.de.
SeeMyLife consortium members

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective participant recruitment is crucial for the success of clinical trials, yet little is known about facilitators and barriers to recruitment in pediatric populations with visual impairment. Understanding which methods yield the highest participant engagement can help optimize recruitment efforts and improve study outcomes. Thus, we assessed factors associated with recruitment in the SeeMyLife study, a European multi-center cohort study about quality of life and participation of children and young people with visual impairment.

methodsData on the perceived effectiveness of recruitment strategies were collected from principal investigators, study coordinators, clinical and research staff using an online survey. Additional information on recruitment approaches was obtained through document analysis of study-related communications, including e-mails and meeting minutes. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize recruitment rates and perceived effectiveness scores. Open-ended responses regarding recruitment challenges were analyzed thematically to identify common barriers and facilitators.

resultsSeventeen clinical and research staff members from six countries participated in the survey and shared their insights and experience with participant recruitment. In total, study staff reported using twelve distinct recruitment sources to enhance participant enrolment. These sources were grouped into three broad categories: healthcare settings, community engagement and educational settings, and professional and system-level approaches. The recruitment of participants using the hospital information system was perceived as the most effective recruitment strategy, used by 71% of respondents. Other highly ranked sources included pediatric visual rehabilitation centers, patient associations, and affiliated university ophthalmology departments, where staff actively presented the study to their patients and referred eligible participants. Commonly reported recruitment challenges included restrictive inclusion criteria, limited parental responsiveness, concerns about the impact of study participation on children's well-being, and institutional barriers.

conclusionsSuccessful strategies for enrolling children and young people with visual impairment into clinical research include direct interactions between clinical staff and families, likely due to established trust, easier identification of eligible participants, and clearer communication about the study. In contrast, recruitment approaches outside clinical care settings were perceived as less effective. These findings highlight the importance of integrating recruitment efforts within established healthcare networks when conducting pediatric vision impairment research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicPatient SelectionVision DisordersAdolescentChildCohort StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansMalePatient ParticipationQuality of LifeResearch PersonnelSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical trialsDisabilityPediatricsRecruitment challengesRecruitment strategiesVisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID42304243
PMCPMC13270738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.