ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Evaluation of fetal brain development in growth restriction subtypes using brain MRI volume measurement.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis retrospective study aims to explore the value of brain MRI volume measurements in evaluating fetal brain development in fetal growth restriction (FGR) fetuses, by comparing 2 subtypes of FGR with appropriate gestational age (AGA) fetuses.
methodsA total of 169 fetal brain MRI with suspected abnormal development, identified through ultrasound screening at this hospital between 2021 and 2025 were analyzed,11 cases were excluded. 98 cases were FGR fetuses (43 early-onset subtypes and 55 late-onset subtypes), and 60 were AGA fetuses, gestational age ranging from 26 to 37 weeks. Three-dimensional reconstruction and image segmentation were performed on fetal intracranial tissues including cerebrum, cerebellum and brainstem. Changes in brain volume at different gestational weeks were analyzed to assess the development of fetal brain anatomical structures.
resultsIn both groups, the Pearson correlation coefficients for cerebrum, brainstem, and cerebellum volume with head circumference and gestational age were greater than 0.8, indicating a strong correlation. Across all gestational age subgroups (26-31 weeks), cerebral, brainstem, and cerebellar volumes were all significantly smaller in early-onset FGR fetuses than in AGA fetuses (independent-samples t-test; e.g., at 26-27 weeks: cerebrum 87.3 ± 9.2 cm³ vs. 113.2 ± 10.3 cm³, brainstem 1.7 ± 0.2 cm³ vs. 2.7 ± 0.3 cm³, cerebellum 3.3 ± 0.6 cm³ vs. 4.6 ± 1.0 cm³; all p < 0.05; early-onset FGR n = 43, AGA n = 30, analysed across three gestational age windows of 10 fetuses each). For late-onset FGR fetuses (32-37 weeks; n = 55 vs. AGA n = 30, analysed across three gestational age windows of 10 fetuses each), cerebral volume was significantly reduced compared with AGA fetuses across all gestational age subgroups (e.g., at 32-33 weeks: 160.1 ± 18.7 cm³ vs. 194.1 ± 18.2 cm³; p < 0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in brain stem volume between late-onset FGR and AGA fetuses at 34 weeks(4.6 ± 0.7cm DISCUSSION: MRI measurement of fetal brain volume can serve as a predictor of brain development in 2 subtypes of FGR. In early-onset FGR, volumes of the brainstem, cerebellum and cerebrum consistently showed smaller growth prior to 32 weeks. Late-onset FGR was characterized by persistently smaller cerebrum volume. Brainstem volume was no longer significantly different from AGA levels by 34 weeks, and cerebellum volume approached AGA levels after 36 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.