Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304206›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026

Genestrip: exact and efficient read classification for selected groups of organisms.

Daniel Pfeifer, Markus Graf, Clas Rurik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel PfeiferIT Faculty, Heilbronn University, Max-Planck-Str. 39, 74081, Heilbronn, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. daniel.pfeifer@hs-heilbronn.de.
Markus GrafIT Faculty, Heilbronn University, Max-Planck-Str. 39, 74081, Heilbronn, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Clas Rurikcodeclap, Kokhaven 20, 6230, Rødekro, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe consumption of main memory resources is a significant burden in k-mer-based metagenomic analysis when creating related databases but also when performing (unique) k-mer-counting and read classification. Genestrip addresses this issue by focusing on small but freely configurable groups of organisms. Regarding the selected organisms, Genestrip produces k-mer databases and results comparable to those of KrakenUniq but at a fraction of its required memory resources. Our tool ensures that during database generation, the most suitable lowest common ancestor taxon is assigned for each stored k-mer by also considering genomes of organisms whose k-mers are not included in the database. This enables read analysis with high precision and recall for the organisms of interest.

resultsWe assess the correctness, usefulness and performance of Genestrip in different contexts and show that it indeed ascertains high quality read classifications for organisms whose genomes are included in a corresponding database. Our example databases comprise millions to a few billions of k-mers covering a dozen to a few thousands of species and lend themselves to usage in tick surveillance, medical diagnostics or agriculture. All databases were generated on a regular PC within hours, and related analysis performance was competitive to highly favorable. The deliberate focus on a particular set of genera or species allows for more genomes to be included from related organisms while the resulting databases remain small. Since k-mer compression becomes unnecessary, false positives emerging from related information loss are entirely avoided. We exemplify that such small but deep databases tend to improve recall during read classification while sustaining high precision.

conclusionsDue to Genestrip's particular way of updating the k-mers' lowest common ancestor taxa, both database creation and fastq file analysis can be realized with little memory and with favorable runtimes as well as high classification quality. So both, database creation and read classification may be performed even on regular PCs. Genestrip's qualities empower users to flexibly design, build and use small k-mer databases for their own needs with potentially deep genomic coverage.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsDatabases, GeneticHumansSoftware DesignHigh performanceHigh precisionHigh recallk-Mer countingMetagenomicsRead classificationSmall k-mer database

Identifiers

PMID42304206
PMCPMC13273988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.