ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2026
Bryophytes of Benin Republic: traditional knowledge, uses and perceived threats.
Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBryophytes are ecologically and socioeconomically important but remain largely understudied from an ethnobotanical perspective, particularly in Africa. This study provides the first assessment of traditional knowledge, uses, perceived threats, and conservation strategies for bryophytes in Benin Republic.
methodsEthnobotanical data were collected through semi-structured interviews (n = 637), free-listing, and participatory ranking among fifteen sociolinguistic groups across the three climatic zones of Benin (humid, sub-humid, and semi-arid). Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to assess (i) bryophyte knowledge, (ii) use patterns, (iii) socio-demographic factors associated with knowledge of bryophytes, (iv) perceived threats, and (v) proposed conservation measures.
resultsSixteen species were cited, of which twelve had documented traditional uses. Vernacular classifications relied mainly on habitat-based descriptors, while medicinal uses were predominant. Philonotis africana (Müll. Hal.) Rehmann ex Paris, Index Bryol. emerged as the most widely known and culturally important species, whereas other taxa showed marked geographic and cultural specificity. Knowledge of bryophytes varied significantly with ethnicity, age, occupation, and education, with elders, traditional healers, and few ethnic groups holding the richest knowledge. Species diversity and uses declined from the humid to the semi-arid zone, consistent with the ecological apparency hypothesis. Deforestation and agricultural expansion were identified as the main threats. Proposed conservation measures emphasized protected areas, reduced forest clearing, and preservation of humid microhabitats.
conclusionsOverall, this study provides important baseline on bryophytes in Benin and essential insights towards their sustainable management. Further studies should be conducted on Philonotis Africana, especially regarding its medicinal and environmental benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.