ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Rapid Multimuscle Cortical Mapping of the Upper Limb: Activity Reveals Intralimb Gradients.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An automated derivative-based method for detection of motor evoked potential onset latencies in multi-muscle transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Rapid Multimuscle Cortical Mapping of the Upper Limb: Activity Reveals Intralimb Gradients.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping provides valuable insight into corticospinal organisation and plasticity, but conventional protocols are often too time-consuming to be practical in clinical settings. This study aimed to refine a rapid, multimuscle TMS mapping protocol capable of comprehensively characterising upper limb motor representations, including both distal and proximal muscles, and to examine how stimulation intensity and voluntary muscle activity shape cortical map metrics and motor evoked potential (MEP) latency. Nineteen healthy adults underwent neuronavigated TMS mapping of eight upper limb muscles using a rapid random walk protocol. Cortical maps were acquired at multiple stimulation intensities referenced to the motor threshold of the first dorsal interosseous muscle, both at rest and during a task requiring low levels of muscle activity. Map area, volume and centre of gravity were quantified using relative and absolute thresholds, alongside automated analysis of MEP onset latency. Cortical representations showed stable somatotopic organisation across conditions, with proximal-muscle centres of gravity located more medially than distal muscles. Increasing stimulation intensity preferentially expanded distal muscle map area and volume, whereas voluntary muscle activity selectively facilitated proximal-muscle representations, even after controlling for background muscle activity. These effects revealed a clear proximal-distal gradient in the physiological modulation of cortical maps. MEP latencies were shorter for proximal muscles and during active contraction. At rest, latency increased with distance from the map centre for several muscles, but this spatial gradient was abolished or inverted during voluntary activity. These findings demonstrate that rapid, multimuscle cortical mapping is feasible and yields physiologically meaningful metrics across the upper limb. The results highlight a functional dissociation between proximal and distal representations and underscore the importance of combining high-intensity resting and active mapping conditions to obtain a complete assessment of corticospinal integrity, with direct relevance for future clinical studies in neurological populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.