ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2026
Short-Term Safety and Adverse Event Risk Profiles for SARS-CoV-2 Booster Vaccine Doses in Australian Adults: A Survey Study.
Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study quantifies the short-term risk profiles of seven severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines-Comirnaty Bivalent BA.1, Comirnaty Bivalent BA.4-5, Comirnaty XBB.1.5, Spikevax Bivalent BA.1, Spikevax Bivalent BA.4-5, Spikevax XBB.1.5 and Nuvaxovid-administered as booster doses in Australia.
designThis is a survey study using data collected from online surveys sent via AusVaxSafety, the Australian active vaccine safety surveillance system, 3 days post-vaccination, soliciting reports of adverse events following vaccination. PARTICIPANTS AND
settingIndividuals 18 years and older who received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster at an AusVaxSafety vaccine surveillance site between 1 January 2023 and 31 August 2024.
main outcome measuresBayesian logistic regression was used to estimate risk of reported adverse events, seeking medical advice and impact on daily activities.
resultsOf 197,476 respondents, 59,089 (29.9%) reported at least one adverse event, of which the most commonly reported symptoms were injection site reaction (23.8% [46,988/197,476]) and fatigue (19.4% [38,352/197,476]). Symptom resolution was reported by 69.9% (41,299/59,089) by day 3 and 5.6% (11,006/197,476) reported any time lost from daily activities. The unadjusted proportion of respondents who sought medical advice was higher in those who received Spikevax XBB.1.5 (1.2% [212/17,551]) than the other vaccines (0.5% [379/69,493] to 0.7% [147/20,271]), but the modelled, adjusted mean risk of medical advice was similar (< 2.5%) across subgroups for vaccine brands, co-administered vaccines, medical conditions, age, sex and Indigenous status. The modelled risk of any adverse event at age 40 years ranged from 35.2% (95% credible interval [CrI], 32.2%-38.5%) for men who had received Comirnaty XBB.1.5 to 75.5% (95% CrI, 71.9%-78.8%) for women who had received Spikevax XBB.1.5. At age 80 years, this risk was lowest across all vaccines, ranging from 12.0% (95% CrI, 11.2%-13.0%) for men who had received Comirnaty BA4-5 to 36.7% (95% CrI, 34.6%-38.7%) for women who had received Spikevax XBB.1.5.
conclusionsThe results of this study confirm the short-term safety and low impact on daily living of SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccine administration to Australian adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.