Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304117›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A hybrid CNN-LSTM approach for large-scale Twitter sentiment analysis with explainable artificial intelligence.

Zeynep Kılıç, Emrah Aslan, Yıldırım Ozupak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zeynep KılıçDepartment of Radio, Television, and Cinema, Faculty of Fine Arts, Mardin Artuklu University, 47000, Mardin, Turkey. zeynepkilic@artuklu.edu.tr.
Emrah AslanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Dicle University, 21000, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Yıldırım OzupakDepartment of Electricity and Energy, Silvan Vocational School, Dicle University, 21000, Diyarbakir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentiment analysis of social media data has become an essential research topic due to the widespread use of platforms such as Twitter for expressing public opinion. However, the short, informal, and context-dependent nature of tweets poses significant challenges for accurate sentiment classification. In this study, a comprehensive sentiment analysis framework is proposed using a hybrid Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) architecture. The proposed model integrates the local feature extraction capability of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) with the sequential and contextual modeling strength of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. The framework is evaluated on a large-scale and balanced Twitter dataset containing over 690,000 tweets labeled as positive, negative, and neutral. Multiple deep learning models, including CNN, LSTM, Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM), and the proposed CNN-LSTM hybrid model, are systematically compared using standard evaluation metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Experimental results demonstrate that the CNN-LSTM hybrid model achieves the best overall performance, with an accuracy of 97.73%, precision of 97.74%, recall of 96.73%, and an F1-score of 97.73%, outperforming all baseline models. Furthermore, model interpretability is enhanced using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), which reveal that sentiment predictions are driven by semantically meaningful and sentiment-relevant words. The experimental findings suggest that the proposed approach provides a strong balance between predictive performance and interpretability for large-scale Twitter sentiment analysis tasks.

Indexed as

CNN–LSTM hybrid modelDeep learningExplainable artificial intelligenceText classificationTwitter sentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID42304117
PMCPMC13538372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.