ArticleScientific reports2026
Phenotypic variability and floral trait associations in bael [Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa] from the North-Western Himalayan plains.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bael is a medicinal fruit tree of considerable economic and therapeutic importance and is predominantly propagated through seeds. The present investigation was undertaken to evaluate and interpret variation in floral characteristics among eighty wild bael genotypes, alongside two widely cultivated varieties, NB-5 and NB-9. Among the genotypes examined, JMU-Bael (Sel-27) consistently recorded the highest measurements for most floral attributes, including flower and bud dimensions, petal size, pedicel traits, as well as reproductive organ characteristics such as filament, anther, ovary, style and stigma size. Multivariate analysis using principal component analysis revealed that the first five principal components together explained 73.90% of the total variability, demonstrating that these components effectively summarized the majority of information contained in the floral traits. Each principal component was associated with a distinct set of correlated floral parameters. Furthermore, cluster analysis grouped the eighty wild genotypes and the two commercial cultivars into two major clusters, each further subdivided into smaller groups based on similarity in floral traits. Overall, the results highlight substantial phenotypic diversity and clear relationships among the evaluated bael genotypes, providing a valuable foundation for future breeding, selection and germplasm improvement programmes. However, as canopy directions of the same tree were used as replications, the observed variability and associated genetic parameter estimates should be interpreted with caution, as environmental and sampling effects may also contribute to the detected variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.