ArticleScientific reports2026
SpatialCell AI achieves reference-free single-cell resolution from spot-based spatial transcriptomics through morphology-guided enhancement.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics platforms such as 10x Visium capture whole-transcriptome expression but at spot-level resolution where each measurement aggregates multiple cells. Existing computational deconvolution methods require external scRNA-seq references, and the growing set of morphology-guided methods (iStar, SpaHDmap, GHIST, Thor, PRTS) each requires per-dataset model training or paired subcellular spatial data. Here we present SpatialCell AI, the first framework to combine training-free operation, reference-free expression integration, and per-cell output granularity for spatial transcriptomics. We validated SpatialCell AI on a matched colorectal cancer sample analyzed across Visium (55 μm), Visium HD (8 μm and 16 μm), and Xenium (single-cell ground truth). On Visium HD 8 μm input, SpatialCell AI achieves an expression correlation of r = 0.791 against the Xenium reference - the highest of any method tested on this sample. Across six distribution-based validation metrics on the matched 408-gene panel, the SpatialCell AI HD variants lead on the majority of metrics, with no competing method winning on any. A strict matched-region head-to-head comparison reveals a clear architectural distinction: training-free integration improves monotonically as input bins approach single-cell scale, while the trained morphology-guided methods iStar and SpaHDmap track the raw baseline on every platform. SpatialCell AI achieves its strongest performance on Visium HD inputs, where it substantially outperforms both raw baselines and competing morphology-guided methods while transforming spot-level data into individual cell records with spatial coordinates and per-cell expression - an output no raw spot measurement can provide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.