ArticleScientific reports2026
Characterization of gut microbiota in wild Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) from five forests across Thailand.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gut Microbiota Differences in Wild Asian Elephants From Pu'er, China.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gut microbiota plays a critical role in mammalian health, yet remains poorly understood in wild Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). This study characterized the gut microbiome of wild elephants using 16S rRNA sequencing of fecal samples collected from five natural habitats in Thailand: Doi Pha Mueang Wildlife Sanctuary (DPM), Khao Ang Rue Nai Wildlife Sanctuary (KARN), Khao Yai National Park (KY), Phuluang Wildlife Sanctuary (PL), and Sublangka Wildlife Sanctuary (SLK), representing distinct geographic regions. Across all sites, Thai wild elephants shared a core gut microbiota dominated by fiber-degrading bacteria. Firmicutes was the most abundant phylum, followed by Bacteroidota, Actinobacteriota, and Proteobacteria. At the family level, Lachnospiraceae predominated, followed by Oscillospiraceae, Anaerovoracaceae, and Christensenellaceae. Environmental variable, including geographic coordinates and minimum elevation, significantly influenced microbial community composition and explained patterns of beta diversity, indicating distinct gut microbiota profiles among elephant populations from different forest regions. These findings establish baseline gut microbiome data for wild Asian elephants and provide a foundation for future ecological and conservation-focused microbiome studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.