Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42304053›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Genomic and bioreactor evaluation of newly isolated cellulase-producing bacteria.

Ida Romano, Marisa Amato, Lucia Amoroso, Paolo Dessì, Irene Giordano, Olimpia Pepe, Valeria Ventorino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ida RomanoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Marisa AmatoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Lucia AmorosoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Paolo DessìDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Irene GiordanoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Olimpia PepeDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. olipepe@unina.it.
Valeria VentorinoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulose is a renewable resource with broad biotechnological potential, and its hydrolysis by cellulases underpins applications such as biofuel production and biowaste valorization. This study combined isolation, screening, molecular identification, enzyme assays, genome sequencing, and bioreactor evaluation to characterize novel cellulase-producing bacteria. Preliminary screening identified and selected bacterial isolates by hydrolysis halo formation, with strains showing halos ≥ 20 mm selected for further quantitative assays. Streptomyces olivaceus C1_7A, Bacillus thuringiensis FBB7BB, and Bacillus licheniformis strains AT081C and AT082C showed the highest endoglucanase activities (from 0.11 to 0.26 U mL

Indexed as

Bacillus licheniformisBacillus thuringiensisBioreactorsCellulaseStreptomycesCelluloseFermentationGenome, BacterialGenomicsHydrolysisWhole Genome SequencingCellulaseCellulose

Identifiers

PMID42304053
PMCPMC13538530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.