ArticleScientific reports2026
Interocular difference in refraction and ocular biometry in children with anisometropia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To examine the association between interocular difference in refraction and ocular biometry in children with anisometropia. This analysis included 91 children aged 6-16 years with anisometropia, identified from a cross-sectional, school-based study of 765 children. All children underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, including cycloplegic biometry and refractometry. The refractive lens power (RLP) was calculated using Bennett's equation. The mean interocular difference in SE was 2.24 ± 1.48D. Compared to the contralateral eye, the more myopic eye or less hyperopic eye exhibited a significantly longer axial length (AL), deeper anterior chamber depth (ACD), thinner lens thickness (LT) and deeper vitreous chamber depth (VCD) (all P < 0.05). No significant interocular differences were observed for corneal curvature radius (CCR), central corneal thickness (CCT) and RLP between the two eyes (all P > 0.05). When exploratory analyzing by anisometropia type, the more myopic eye or less hyperopic eye had a significantly thinner LT and less RLP than the contralateral eye in the antimetropia group. In univariate analysis, interocular difference in SE was significantly associated with interocular difference in AL (β=-0.822, P < 0.001), ACD (β=-0.401, P < 0.001 ) and VCD (β=-0.831, P < 0.001). In the multivariate regression analysis, interocular difference in SE was significantly associated with age (β = 0.144, P = 0.002), interocular difference in AL (β=-1.024, P < 0.001) and RLP (β=-0.421, P < 0.001). Interocular difference in the parameters of AL and crystalline lens are significant factors associated with anisometropia, whereas corneal parameters show no significant interocular difference between the two eyes. The role of lenticular parameters appears to be type-dependent. Exploratory analysis further revealed that the interocular difference in a compensatory lenticular pattern to axial elongation varies among different types of anisometropia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.