ArticleScientific reports2026
Balancing accuracy and efficiency in lumbar spine image segmentation using multi-scale attention and residual learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate automated segmentation of Lumbar Spine Structures (LSS) in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is important for effective diagnosis and treatment planning. However, most current methods encounter a trade-off between segmentation precision and computational efficiency. In particular, several methods fall short in modelling the intricate multi-scale anatomical details and subtle boundary transitions typical of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs, thereby limiting their clinical utility. This study introduces Multiscale Residual and Adaptive Spatial-Channel Feature Pyramid Network (MRAS + FPN), a novel Deep Learning (DL) designed to enhance Lumbar Spine Segmentation. The model integrates Multi-Scale Attention (MS) with Residual Learning (RL) to balance accuracy and efficiency. Two principal innovations are embedded in the design: (a) Multiscale Residual Attention Blocks (MRAB), which incorporate Directionally Dilated Convolution Modules (DDCM) coupled with spatial-channel attention to address anisotropic anatomical structures, and (b) Adaptive Spatial-Channel Attention Blocks (ASCAB), which refine Feature Selection (FS) across pyramid levels dynamically. Also, Cross-level Feature Gating (CFG) is employed to regulate information flow between the encoder and decoder. The model was trained and validated on the MRSpineSeg dataset, which comprises 215 T2-weighted lumbar MRI volumes annotated by experts, covering vertebrae T9-S1 and their corresponding intervertebral discs. A composite loss function was used, combining Dice, Binary Cross-Entropy, and a boundary-sensitive term. MRAS-FPN proved to have improved segmentation performance compared with established models, including 2D U-Net, 3D U-Net, and DeepLab v3+. It achieved a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 87.8 ± 1.3% and a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 78.2 ± 2.1%, outperforming the best baseline (3D U-Net: 83.4% DSC, 73.4% mIoU) by 4.4% and 4.8%. Evaluation of boundary accuracy showed marked improvements, with a 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95) of 3.18 ± 0.8 mm and an Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD) of 1.32 ± 0.5 mm-representing gains of 19.9% and 25.0% compared to 3D U-Net. Structure-wise analysis indicated stable segmentation quality across all vertebral levels (T9-S1: 84.4% mean DSC) and intervertebral discs (85.6% mean DSC), with notable gains in regions of high anatomical complexity. Ablation experiments further confirmed the utility of each component, with MRAB generating a 3.9% improvement in DSC and ASCAB contributing an additional 2.1% over the base FPN. MRAS-FPN achieves a well-calibrated balance between segmentation fidelity and resource efficiency, generating SOTA results while requiring manageable computational resources (22.1 hours of training time and 15.8 GB of memory). Its MSA successfully captures intricate anatomical features and boundary definitions critical for clinical use. The model's strong performance across a standard range of spinal structures and its resilience to overfitting underscore its applicability in real-world scenarios, including surgical planning, diagnostic support, and automated testing of the Lumbar Spine (LS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.