ArticleScientific reports2026
Cuboid height measured using ultrasound is related to sex and dorsal arch height.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between cuboid height (CH) measured using ultrasound (US) and sex differences, as well as clinically assessed foot characteristics and physical characteristics. The study included 73 university students (43 males and 30 females). Basic participant attributes, including age, height, body mass, and foot length in a static standing position, were recorded and measured. Cuboid height (CH) was measured using US to evaluate the lateral longitudinal arch of the foot. Dorsal arch height (DAH) and the Foot Posture Index-6 (FPI-6) were measured as indicators related to the medial longitudinal arch of the foot. Statistical analysis was performed to compare age, height, weight, foot length, CH, DAH, and FPI-6 between men and women, depending on the results of normality tests. Subsequently, multiple regression analysis was conducted on the combined male and female group. CH values were greater in men than in women. The results of the multiple regression analysis indicated that the factors influencing CH were DAH and sex (DAH: Standardized β = 0.911, sex: Standardized β = 0.290) Furthermore, the intercept = -16.29, the adjusted R² = 0.531, with p < 0.001. CH is influenced by DAH and sex, suggesting that reference values differ between men and women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.