ArticleNature communications2026
Meiotic pairing through barcode-like satellite DNA repeats.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During meiosis, chromosomes must find, pair, and synapse with their homologous partners in the crowded milieu of the nucleus. Although homology detection generally relies on recombination, pairing can occur in its absence, suggesting alternative mechanisms. Here, we show that the barcode-like arrangement of non-coding satellite DNA repeats facilitates homologue pairing during meiosis. Using satellite DNA deletion, duplication, and translocation strains, we demonstrate that repeat mismatches perturb meiotic pairing, particularly at centromeres and pericentromeres. Notably, pairing defects are also observed in the progeny of D. melanogaster natural populations that have diverged in their satellite DNA content. In the absence of satellite DNA homology, pairing is antagonised by the HORMAD protein, Mad2, while a Pachytene checkpoint 2 (Pch2)-dependent meiotic delay restores pairing. In addition, compromised meiotic pairing is strongly correlated with mid-oogenesis cell death, a quality control mechanism that likely culls defective oocytes to prevent chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy. Taken together, our findings reveal an important role for satellite DNA repeats during meiotic homology detection. We propose that this repeat-based pairing mechanism exerts an underappreciated selective pressure, constraining the divergence of rapidly evolving satellite DNA within interbreeding natural populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.