ArticleGeroScience2026
Intrinsic capacity and mortality in community-dwelling octogenarians: a network analysis from the ilSIRENTE study.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intrinsic capacity (IC) is a key construct within the healthy ageing framework. However, the correlations among IC domains and their association with health outcomes in very old adults remain unclear. This study aimed to characterise the relationships among IC domains using network analysis and to examine their association with mortality in community-dwelling octogenarians from the Invecchiamento e Longevità nel Sirente (ilSIRENTE) cohort. IC was calculated as a summary score rescaled to a 0-100 range across locomotion, cognition, vitality, psychological capacity, and sensory function, derived from routine home-based geriatric assessments (Minimum Data Set for Home Care instruments and supplementary tests). Assessments were conducted at designated centres, with home visits arranged for individuals unable to travel. The final sample included 319 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 80 years (mean age 85.4 ± 4.8 years; 67.1% women). Network analysis suggested clustered relationships among vitality, psychological, and cognitive domains, whereas sensory domains appeared more peripheral. Hearing and vision were associated with locomotion, while their association with cognition appeared to be mediated by locomotion. In Cox proportional hazards models, higher locomotion scores were independently associated with lower mortality at 4 years [hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.93] and 7 years (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.92). Each 10-point increase in IC was associated with lower mortality at 4 years (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.58-0.77) and 7 years (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.61-0.77). Among very old adults, locomotion emerged as a central functional domain linking sensory function, cognition, and survival within the IC framework. IC measures derived from routine assessments may provide a pragmatic approach for risk stratification and targeted interventions to promote healthy ageing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.